ACWI vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 2308 holdings · $33.2B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ACWI: 2026-04-30, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWI and IXN?
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI, by iShares) holds 2308 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 129 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 129ACWI holds 2308 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWI 27%·IXN 99%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWI
2179 of 2308 positions (72.7% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWI | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 28.2% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 10.3% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 8.8% | 0.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of ACWI, 0% of IXN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWI | +3.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +20.4% | +11.3% | +12.8% | 1.39% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWI vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(129)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
4.88% | 13.97% | 4.88% | |
4.01% | 12.28% | 4.01% | |
2.90% | 9.06% | 2.90% | |
1.89% | 4.84% | 1.89% | |
1.73% | 4.60% | 1.73% | |
0.72% | 3.39% | 0.72% | |
0.59% | 2.21% | 0.59% | |
0.58% | 1.93% | 0.58% | |
0.56% | 3.01% | 0.56% | |
0.49% | 1.80% | 0.49% | |
0.43% | 1.21% | 0.43% | |
0.36% | 1.79% | 0.36% | |
0.33% | 1.55% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 1.95% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 1.58% | 0.32% | |
0.28% | 1.45% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 1.03% | 0.26% | |
0.23% | 1.12% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 1.32% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.91% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.80% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.74% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.90% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 1.01% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 1.02% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWI and IXN overlap?
ACWI and IXN overlap by 27.0% of portfolio weight. They share 129 holdings (ACWI holds 2308 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWI and IXN?
The two portfolios are 27.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWI and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and TSMWF. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does ACWI own that IXN doesn't?
2179 positions (72.7% of ACWI) are unique to ACWI, led by AMZN, GOOGL and GOOG. In the other direction, 8 positions (0.8% of IXN) are unique to IXN.