ACWI vs IXP: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 2308 holdings · $33.2B · as of 2026-04-30
IXPiShares Global Comm Services ETF
iShares · 81 holdings · $577M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ACWI: 2026-04-30, IXP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWI and IXP?
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI, by iShares) holds 2308 positions; iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP, by iShares) holds 81. They have 73 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 73ACWI holds 2308 · IXP holds 81
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWI 8%·IXP 99%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWI
2235 of 2308 positions (91.4% of the fund) are not held by IXP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWI | IXP |
|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 8.8% | 99.8% |
| Information Technology | 28.2% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 10.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of ACWI, 0% of IXP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWI | +3.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +20.4% | +11.3% | +12.8% | 1.39% |
| IXP | +1.2% | -2.0% | +6.3% | +20.8% | +8.3% | +8.8% | 3.33% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWI vs IXP →
Shared Holdings(73)
The top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, GOOG and META.
2.25% | 10.52% | 2.25% | |
1.87% | 8.43% | 1.87% | |
1.34% | 14.85% | 1.34% | |
0.40% | 4.81% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 4.57% | 0.39% | |
0.20% | 4.67% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 5.04% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 4.51% | 0.19% | |
0.13% | 2.66% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 3.61% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 2.91% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 2.81% | 0.10% | |
0.07% | 1.92% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 1.88% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 1.30% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 1.35% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 1.08% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 1.07% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.97% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 1.06% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.88% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.83% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 1.48% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.77% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.68% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWI and IXP overlap?
ACWI and IXP overlap by 8.3% of portfolio weight. They share 73 holdings (ACWI holds 2308 positions and IXP holds 81), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWI and IXP?
The two portfolios are 8.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWI and IXP?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, GOOG, META, NFLX and 700. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the total overlap.
What does ACWI own that IXP doesn't?
2235 positions (91.4% of ACWI) are unique to ACWI, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 8 positions (1.1% of IXP) are unique to IXP.