ACWX vs CGXU: Holdings Overlap
ACWXiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
iShares · 1761 holdings · $11.7B · as of 2026-04-30
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ACWX: 2026-04-30, CGXU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWX and CGXU?
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX, by iShares) holds 1761 positions; Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72. They have 66 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 66ACWX holds 1761 · CGXU holds 72
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWX 22%·CGXU 90%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWX
1695 of 1761 positions (78.1% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWX | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 21.6% | 12.6% |
| Information Technology | 17.5% | 20.3% |
| Industrials | 12.5% | 15.2% |
| Materials | 5.8% | 13.6% |
| Communication Services | 4.5% | 10.5% |
| Other Sectors | 26.3% | 19.4% |
| Unclassified | 11.4% | 4.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (11% of ACWX, 5% of CGXU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWX | +3.0% | +16.6% | +28.7% | +19.1% | +9.3% | +9.6% | 2.46% |
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWX vs CGXU →
Shared Holdings(66)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 005930 and ASML.
4.67% | 6.83% | 4.67% | |
1.95% | 3.10% | 1.95% | |
1.54% | 2.43% | 1.54% | |
1.33% | 3.27% | 1.33% | |
1.07% | 1.27% | 1.07% | |
0.71% | 1.05% | 0.71% | |
0.62% | 0.74% | 0.62% | |
0.45% | 0.51% | 0.45% | |
0.41% | 1.62% | 0.41% | |
0.37% | 2.46% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 1.08% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 2.29% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 6.36% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 1.43% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 2.11% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 1.10% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 1.46% | 0.30% | |
0.28% | 1.17% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.69% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 3.00% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.53% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 1.25% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 1.05% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 1.00% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 0.70% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWX and CGXU overlap?
ACWX and CGXU overlap by 21.6% of portfolio weight. They share 66 holdings (ACWX holds 1761 positions and CGXU holds 72), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWX and CGXU?
The two portfolios are 21.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWX and CGXU?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 005930, ASML, 000660 and 700. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does ACWX own that CGXU doesn't?
1695 positions (78.1% of ACWX) are unique to ACWX, led by HSBA, AZN and 9988. In the other direction, 6 positions (5.8% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU.