ACWX vs IOO: Holdings Overlap
ACWXiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
iShares · 1761 holdings · $11.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 110 holdings · $9.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ACWX: 2026-04-30, IOO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWX and IOO?
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX, by iShares) holds 1761 positions; iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO, by iShares) holds 110. They have 59 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 59ACWX holds 1761 · IOO holds 110
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWX 21%·IOO 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWX
1702 of 1761 positions (78.8% of the fund) are not held by IOO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWX | IOO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 17.5% | 42.3% |
| Financials | 21.6% | 10.0% |
| Industrials | 12.5% | 5.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.5% | 10.1% |
| Health Care | 6.1% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 22.5% |
| Unclassified | 11.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (11% of ACWX, 0% of IOO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWX | +3.0% | +16.6% | +28.7% | +19.1% | +9.3% | +9.6% | 2.46% |
| IOO | +5.6% | +16.0% | +31.2% | +25.4% | +16.4% | +16.6% | 0.80% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWX vs IOO →
Shared Holdings(59)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by 005930, ASML and 700.
1.95% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
1.54% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |
1.07% | 1.10% | 1.07% | |
0.86% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
0.80% | 0.87% | 0.80% | |
0.78% | 0.80% | 0.78% | |
0.76% | 0.84% | 0.76% | |
0.71% | 0.72% | 0.71% | |
0.71% | 0.75% | 0.71% | |
0.57% | 0.58% | 0.57% | |
0.55% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.62% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.51% | 0.70% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 0.53% | 0.50% | |
0.48% | 0.50% | 0.48% | |
0.49% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.47% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.36% | 0.40% | 0.36% | |
0.44% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.37% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.36% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 0.35% | 0.34% | |
0.39% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWX and IOO overlap?
ACWX and IOO overlap by 20.0% of portfolio weight. They share 59 holdings (ACWX holds 1761 positions and IOO holds 110), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWX and IOO?
The two portfolios are 20.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWX and IOO?
The largest positions held by both funds are 005930, ASML, 700, HSBA and AZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does ACWX own that IOO doesn't?
1702 positions (78.8% of ACWX) are unique to ACWX, led by TSMWF, 000660 and 9988. In the other direction, 51 positions (78.9% of IOO) are unique to IOO.