AGG vs IWF: Holdings Overlap
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
iShares · 13266 holdings · $137.7B · as of 2026-05-31
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (AGG: 2026-05-31, IWF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are AGG and IWF?
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG, by iShares) holds 13266 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0AGG holds 13266 · IWF holds 387
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- AGG 0%·IWF 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in AGG
13266 of 13266 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by IWF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.42%
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.41%
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.41%
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.40%
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.40%
- U.S. Treasury Notes0.39%
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGG | -0.3% | +0.0% | +2.4% | +4.2% | -0.2% | +1.4% | 4.04% |
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in AGG vs IWF →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do AGG and IWF overlap?
AGG and IWF overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (AGG holds 13266 positions and IWF holds 387), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both AGG and IWF?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does AGG own that IWF doesn't?
13266 positions (98.5% of AGG) are unique to AGG, led by U.S. Treasury Notes, U.S. Treasury Notes and U.S. Treasury Notes. In the other direction, 387 positions (99.8% of IWF) are unique to IWF.