ARKF vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
ARKFARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF
ARK · 40 holdings · $701M · as of 2026-04-30
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ARKF: 2026-04-30, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ARKF and ONEQ?
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF, by ARK) holds 40 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19ARKF holds 40 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ARKF 55%·ONEQ 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ARKF
21 of 40 positions (44.6% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ARKF | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 25.3% | 53.0% |
| Financials | 37.4% | 2.8% |
| Communication Services | 12.6% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.9% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Unclassified | 11.5% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (12% of ARKF, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKF | +3.5% | -9.8% | -20.5% | +24.9% | -3.9% | — | 0.10% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ARKF vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by AMZN, META and AMD.
3.87% | 6.33% | 3.87% | |
2.87% | 3.01% | 2.87% | |
3.88% | 1.83% | 1.83% | |
1.82% | 11.18% | 1.82% | |
4.20% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.30% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
9.27% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
3.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
4.47% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.31% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.59% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
5.83% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
2.51% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.65% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
2.87% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.79% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.68% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.89% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.21% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ARKF and ONEQ overlap?
ARKF and ONEQ overlap by 12.8% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (ARKF holds 40 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ARKF and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 12.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ARKF and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AMZN, META, AMD, NVDA and PLTR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does ARKF own that ONEQ doesn't?
21 positions (44.6% of ARKF) are unique to ARKF, led by ARKB, CRCL and XYZ. In the other direction, 1003 positions (74.7% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.