ARKG vs IWN: Holdings Overlap
ARKGARK Genomic Revolution ETF
ARK · 32 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-04-30
IWNiShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
iShares · 1406 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ARKG: 2026-04-30, IWN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ARKG and IWN?
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG, by ARK) holds 32 positions; iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN, by iShares) holds 1406. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11ARKG holds 32 · IWN holds 1406
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ARKG 36%·IWN 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ARKG
21 of 32 positions (64.0% of the fund) are not held by IWN.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ARKG | IWN |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 93.3% | 10.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 22.4% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 11.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.7% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 31.1% |
| Unclassified | 6.3% | 7.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of ARKG, 7% of IWN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKG | +1.0% | +48.6% | +84.8% | +9.2% | -13.0% | +9.2% | — |
| IWN | +2.4% | +25.3% | +42.6% | +16.8% | +9.0% | +10.2% | 1.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ARKG vs IWN →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by 1CG, TXG and NRIX.
8.91% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
5.77% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.33% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
3.82% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.41% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.41% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
3.58% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.96% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.55% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
4.78% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ARKG and IWN overlap?
ARKG and IWN overlap by 0.7% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (ARKG holds 32 positions and IWN holds 1406), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ARKG and IWN?
The two portfolios are 0.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ARKG and IWN?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1CG, TXG, NRIX, NTLA and PACB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does ARKG own that IWN doesn't?
21 positions (64.0% of ARKG) are unique to ARKG, led by TEM, TWST and BEAM. In the other direction, 1395 positions (98.9% of IWN) are unique to IWN.