ARKG vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
ARKGARK Genomic Revolution ETF
ARK · 32 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-04-30
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ARKG: 2026-04-30, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ARKG and ONEQ?
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG, by ARK) holds 32 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18ARKG holds 32 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ARKG 72%·ONEQ 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ARKG
14 of 32 positions (27.9% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ARKG | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 93.3% | 4.4% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Unclassified | 6.3% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of ARKG, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKG | +1.0% | +48.6% | +84.8% | +9.2% | -13.0% | +9.2% | — |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ARKG vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by NTRA, ILMN and GH.
4.07% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
4.03% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
3.49% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.74% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.06% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
9.42% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
8.91% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
8.99% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
5.77% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
5.43% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.66% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.33% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.42% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
3.51% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
3.82% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.51% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ARKG and ONEQ overlap?
ARKG and ONEQ overlap by 0.3% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (ARKG holds 32 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ARKG and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 0.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ARKG and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NTRA, ILMN, GH, IONS and BNTX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does ARKG own that ONEQ doesn't?
14 positions (27.9% of ARKG) are unique to ARKG, led by ABSI, PSNL and CDNA. In the other direction, 1004 positions (99.2% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.