ASHR vs IEMG: Holdings Overlap
ASHRXtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
Xtrackers (DWS) · 285 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-29
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ASHR and IEMG?
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR, by Xtrackers (DWS)) holds 285 positions; iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697. They have 261 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 261ASHR holds 285 · IEMG holds 2697
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ASHR 98%·IEMG 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ASHR
24 of 285 positions (2.1% of the fund) are not held by IEMG.
Only in IEMG
2436 of 2697 positions (97.0% of the fund) are not held by ASHR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASHR | +0.0% | +6.9% | +24.7% | +9.8% | -0.1% | +5.1% | 2.16% |
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ASHR vs IEMG →
Shared Holdings(261)
The top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the overlap, led by 300750, 600519 and 300308.
4.19% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
3.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
4.85% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.10% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.56% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.77% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
2.62% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.30% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.89% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.42% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.68% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
2.15% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.99% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.06% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.88% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.05% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.68% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.97% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.81% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.17% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.70% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.67% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.85% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.21% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Showing the top 250 of 261 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ASHR and IEMG overlap?
ASHR and IEMG overlap by 2.7% of portfolio weight. They share 261 holdings (ASHR holds 285 positions and IEMG holds 2697), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ASHR and IEMG?
The two portfolios are 2.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ASHR and IEMG?
The largest positions held by both funds are 300750, 600519, 300308, 601138 and 688256. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the total overlap.
What does ASHR own that IEMG doesn't?
24 positions (2.1% of ASHR) are unique to ASHR, led by SIEYUAN ELECTRIC CO LTD 'A'CNY1, CGN Power Co Ltd and 300803. In the other direction, 2436 positions (97.0% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG.