AVUV vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
AVUVAvantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
Avantis · 795 holdings · $30.2B · as of 2026-05-31
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (AVUV: 2026-05-31, XMHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are AVUV and XMHQ?
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV, by Avantis) holds 795 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17AVUV holds 795 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- AVUV 5%·XMHQ 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in AVUV
778 of 795 positions (94.5% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | AVUV | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 14.3% | 28.5% |
| Financials | 24.6% | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 4.4% | 19.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.5% | 9.5% |
| Energy | 15.0% | 6.7% |
| Other Sectors | 19.6% | 20.5% |
| Unclassified | 4.3% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of AVUV, 0% of XMHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVUV | +3.0% | +25.2% | +39.5% | +16.7% | +13.2% | — | 1.23% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in AVUV vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by WFRD, MTG and THG.
0.57% | 0.86% | 0.57% | |
0.51% | 0.71% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 0.87% | 0.50% | |
0.70% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 0.67% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 0.50% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.26% | 0.50% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 1.13% | 0.25% | |
0.21% | 0.22% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.24% | 0.20% | |
0.15% | 0.22% | 0.15% | |
0.10% | 1.50% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.05% | 0.09% | |
0.02% | 1.11% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 0.98% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do AVUV and XMHQ overlap?
AVUV and XMHQ overlap by 5.0% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (AVUV holds 795 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both AVUV and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 5.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of AVUV and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are WFRD, MTG, THG, CBT and ESNT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does AVUV own that XMHQ doesn't?
778 positions (94.5% of AVUV) are unique to AVUV, led by VSAT, MATX and LEA. In the other direction, 63 positions (88.2% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.