BBAX vs CGXU: Holdings Overlap
BBAXJPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 96 holdings · $6.7B · as of 2026-04-30
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBAX: 2026-04-30, CGXU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBAX and CGXU?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX, by JPMorgan) holds 96 positions; Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3BBAX holds 96 · CGXU holds 72
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBAX 8%·CGXU 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBAX
93 of 96 positions (91.7% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in CGXU
69 of 72 positions (93.4% of the fund) are not held by BBAX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBAX | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 45.0% | 12.6% |
| Information Technology | 0.2% | 20.3% |
| Industrials | 7.0% | 15.2% |
| Materials | 14.6% | 13.6% |
| Communication Services | 2.3% | 10.5% |
| Other Sectors | 23.4% | 19.4% |
| Unclassified | 6.6% | 4.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of BBAX, 5% of CGXU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBAX | +8.2% | +18.1% | +21.6% | +15.2% | +7.0% | — | 3.44% |
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBAX vs CGXU →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 1299, 669 and ST.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBAX and CGXU overlap?
BBAX and CGXU overlap by 2.7% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (BBAX holds 96 positions and CGXU holds 72), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBAX and CGXU?
The two portfolios are 2.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBAX and CGXU?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1299, 669 and ST. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does BBAX own that CGXU doesn't?
93 positions (91.7% of BBAX) are unique to BBAX, led by CBA, BHP and WBC. In the other direction, 69 positions (93.4% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU.