BBAX vs EFA: Holdings Overlap
BBAXJPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 96 holdings · $6.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBAX and EFA?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX, by JPMorgan) holds 96 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705. They have 81 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 81BBAX holds 96 · EFA holds 705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBAX 95%·EFA 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBAX
15 of 96 positions (3.7% of the fund) are not held by EFA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBAX | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 45.0% | 23.8% |
| Industrials | 7.0% | 18.5% |
| Materials | 14.6% | 5.8% |
| Health Care | 3.2% | 9.7% |
| Information Technology | 0.2% | 9.1% |
| Other Sectors | 22.6% | 26.9% |
| Unclassified | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of BBAX, 6% of EFA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBAX | +8.2% | +18.1% | +21.6% | +15.2% | +7.0% | — | 3.44% |
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBAX vs EFA →
Shared Holdings(81)
The top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the overlap, led by CBA, BHP and 1299.
9.55% | 0.97% | 0.97% | |
8.66% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
5.20% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
4.25% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
4.32% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
4.00% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
3.61% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
2.83% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
2.88% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
2.73% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
2.54% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
2.06% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.05% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.91% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.97% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.73% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.42% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.37% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.35% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.35% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.11% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.03% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.01% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.01% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.97% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBAX and EFA overlap?
BBAX and EFA overlap by 9.8% of portfolio weight. They share 81 holdings (BBAX holds 96 positions and EFA holds 705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBAX and EFA?
The two portfolios are 9.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBAX and EFA?
The largest positions held by both funds are CBA, BHP, 1299, DBS and WBC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the total overlap.
What does BBAX own that EFA doesn't?
15 positions (3.7% of BBAX) are unique to BBAX, led by 2269, JHX and BSL. In the other direction, 624 positions (89.5% of EFA) are unique to EFA.