BBAX vs EWA: Holdings Overlap
BBAXJPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 96 holdings · $6.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 48 holdings · $1.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBAX: 2026-04-30, EWA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBAX and EWA?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX, by JPMorgan) holds 96 positions; iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA, by iShares) holds 48. They have 43 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 63.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 63.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 43BBAX holds 96 · EWA holds 48
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBAX 63%·EWA 97%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBAX
53 of 96 positions (35.8% of the fund) are not held by EWA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBAX | EWA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 45.0% | 40.6% |
| Materials | 14.6% | 25.5% |
| Real Estate | 7.6% | 5.3% |
| Industrials | 7.0% | 4.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.1% | 5.9% |
| Other Sectors | 14.3% | 16.5% |
| Unclassified | 6.6% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of BBAX, 1% of EWA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBAX | +8.2% | +18.1% | +21.6% | +15.2% | +7.0% | — | 3.44% |
| EWA | +8.1% | +17.8% | +17.9% | +14.3% | +7.2% | +8.2% | 2.79% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBAX vs EWA →
Shared Holdings(43)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by CBA, BHP and WBC.
9.55% | 13.76% | 9.55% | |
8.66% | 15.69% | 8.66% | |
4.32% | 6.14% | 4.32% | |
4.00% | 5.71% | 4.00% | |
3.61% | 5.30% | 3.61% | |
2.83% | 4.31% | 2.83% | |
2.73% | 4.51% | 2.73% | |
2.06% | 3.45% | 2.06% | |
2.05% | 2.89% | 2.05% | |
1.97% | 2.34% | 1.97% | |
1.91% | 3.22% | 1.91% | |
1.42% | 2.32% | 1.42% | |
1.37% | 2.14% | 1.37% | |
1.11% | 1.70% | 1.11% | |
1.03% | 1.89% | 1.03% | |
1.01% | 1.12% | 1.01% | |
1.00% | 1.29% | 1.00% | |
0.97% | 1.38% | 0.97% | |
0.97% | 1.45% | 0.97% | |
0.80% | 1.27% | 0.80% | |
0.80% | 1.24% | 0.80% | |
0.69% | 1.02% | 0.69% | |
0.68% | 0.93% | 0.68% | |
0.63% | 0.99% | 0.63% | |
0.61% | 0.94% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBAX and EWA overlap?
BBAX and EWA overlap by 63.4% of portfolio weight. They share 43 holdings (BBAX holds 96 positions and EWA holds 48), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBAX and EWA?
The two portfolios are 63.4% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBAX and EWA?
The largest positions held by both funds are CBA, BHP, WBC, NAB and ANZ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does BBAX own that EWA doesn't?
53 positions (35.8% of BBAX) are unique to BBAX, led by 1299, DBS and 388. In the other direction, 5 positions (2.1% of EWA) are unique to EWA.