BBCA vs EWC: Holdings Overlap
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBCA: 2026-04-30, EWC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBCA and EWC?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76 positions; iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84. They have 73 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 94.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 94.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 73BBCA holds 76 · EWC holds 84
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBCA 97%·EWC 97%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBCA
3 of 76 positions (2.1% of the fund) are not held by EWC.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBCA | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 36.7% | 37.4% |
| Energy | 17.5% | 17.1% |
| Materials | 14.6% | 15.5% |
| Information Technology | 8.4% | 8.2% |
| Industrials | 7.5% | 5.5% |
| Other Sectors | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Unclassified | 5.2% | 6.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of BBCA, 7% of EWC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBCA vs EWC →
Shared Holdings(73)
The top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the overlap, led by RY, TD and SHOP.
8.39% | 8.71% | 8.39% | |
6.02% | 6.28% | 6.02% | |
4.94% | 4.74% | 4.74% | |
4.02% | 3.89% | 3.89% | |
3.58% | 3.74% | 3.58% | |
3.44% | 3.30% | 3.30% | |
3.19% | 3.22% | 3.19% | |
3.25% | 3.08% | 3.08% | |
3.14% | 3.00% | 3.00% | |
2.76% | 3.05% | 2.76% | |
2.61% | 2.60% | 2.60% | |
2.74% | 2.44% | 2.44% | |
2.31% | 2.25% | 2.25% | |
2.19% | 2.34% | 2.19% | |
2.20% | 2.09% | 2.09% | |
2.04% | 2.02% | 2.02% | |
1.91% | 1.98% | 1.91% | |
1.97% | 1.85% | 1.85% | |
1.71% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
1.56% | 1.45% | 1.45% | |
1.40% | 1.45% | 1.40% | |
1.37% | 1.35% | 1.35% | |
1.33% | 1.29% | 1.29% | |
1.32% | 1.27% | 1.27% | |
1.26% | 1.34% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBCA and EWC overlap?
BBCA and EWC overlap by 94.3% of portfolio weight. They share 73 holdings (BBCA holds 76 positions and EWC holds 84), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBCA and EWC?
The two portfolios are 94.3% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBCA and EWC?
The largest positions held by both funds are RY, TD, SHOP, ENB and BMO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the total overlap.
What does BBCA own that EWC doesn't?
3 positions (2.1% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA, led by WCN, Thomson Reuters Corp. and QBR-B. In the other direction, 11 positions (3.3% of EWC) are unique to EWC.