BBCA vs GDX: Holdings Overlap
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
VanEck · 51 holdings · $23.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (BBCA: 2026-04-30, GDX: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBCA and GDX?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76 positions; VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX, by VanEck) holds 51. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7BBCA holds 76 · GDX holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBCA 11%·GDX 39%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBCA
69 of 76 positions (88.5% of the fund) are not held by GDX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBCA | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 14.6% | 97.4% |
| Financials | 36.7% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 17.5% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.4% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.2% | 2.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of BBCA, 2% of GDX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
| GDX | +18.6% | +4.8% | +56.3% | +47.0% | +23.7% | +12.6% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBCA vs GDX →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AEM, ABX and WPM.
3.14% | 12.08% | 3.14% | |
2.19% | 7.63% | 2.19% | |
1.91% | 4.89% | 1.91% | |
1.40% | 5.16% | 1.40% | |
1.21% | 4.68% | 1.21% | |
0.73% | 3.19% | 0.73% | |
0.22% | 1.26% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBCA and GDX overlap?
BBCA and GDX overlap by 10.8% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (BBCA holds 76 positions and GDX holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBCA and GDX?
The two portfolios are 10.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBCA and GDX?
The largest positions held by both funds are AEM, ABX, WPM, FNV and KUSD. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does BBCA own that GDX doesn't?
69 positions (88.5% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 44 positions (60.8% of GDX) are unique to GDX.