BBCA vs MXI: Holdings Overlap
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
MXIiShares Global Materials ETF
iShares · 101 holdings · $349M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (BBCA: 2026-04-30, MXI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBCA and MXI?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76 positions; iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI, by iShares) holds 101. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9BBCA holds 76 · MXI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBCA 13%·MXI 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBCA
67 of 76 positions (86.5% of the fund) are not held by MXI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBCA | MXI |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 14.6% | 99.5% |
| Financials | 36.7% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 17.5% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.4% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 5.2% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of BBCA, 0% of MXI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
| MXI | +6.2% | +18.1% | +32.9% | +13.0% | +7.2% | +10.9% | 1.62% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBCA vs MXI →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AEM, ABX and WPM.
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | 3.14% | 3.44% | 3.14% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ABXBarrick Mining Corp. | 2.19% | 2.31% | 2.19% |
 WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 1.91% | 2.01% | 1.91% |
 FNVFranco-Nevada Corp. | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.40% |
 NTRNutrien Ltd. | 1.24% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
 KUSDKinross Gold Corp. | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.21% |
 TECKTeck Resources Ltd., Class B | 0.88% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
 FMFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
 CCL-BCCL Industries, Inc., Class B | 0.31% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBCA and MXI overlap?
BBCA and MXI overlap by 12.7% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (BBCA holds 76 positions and MXI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBCA and MXI?
The two portfolios are 12.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBCA and MXI?
The largest positions held by both funds are AEM, ABX, WPM, FNV and NTR. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does BBCA own that MXI doesn't?
67 positions (86.5% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA, led by RY, TD and SHOP. In the other direction, 92 positions (86.2% of MXI) are unique to MXI.