BBIN vs IEMG: Holdings Overlap
BBINJPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
JPMorgan · 649 holdings · $6.6B · as of 2026-04-30
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBIN: 2026-04-30, IEMG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBIN and IEMG?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN, by JPMorgan) holds 649 positions; iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11BBIN holds 649 · IEMG holds 2697
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBIN 1%·IEMG 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBIN
638 of 649 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by IEMG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IEMG
2686 of 2697 positions (98.8% of the fund) are not held by BBIN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBIN | IEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 8.9% | 36.2% |
| Financials | 24.2% | 11.0% |
| Industrials | 18.7% | 2.4% |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 0.9% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.9% | 1.4% |
| Other Sectors | 25.8% | 17.2% |
| Unclassified | 4.8% | 30.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of BBIN, 31% of IEMG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBIN | +4.0% | +14.6% | +24.9% | +17.9% | +9.8% | — | 3.52% |
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBIN vs IEMG →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by PKO, PKN and 2269.
0.11% | 0.17% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.08% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 0.09% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.07% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.05% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.05% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBIN and IEMG overlap?
BBIN and IEMG overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (BBIN holds 649 positions and IEMG holds 2697), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBIN and IEMG?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBIN and IEMG?
The largest positions held by both funds are PKO, PKN, 2269, PEO and KGH. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does BBIN own that IEMG doesn't?
638 positions (98.5% of BBIN) are unique to BBIN, led by ASML, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 2686 positions (98.8% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG.