BBJP vs CGXU: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, CGXU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and CGXU?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13BBJP holds 179 · CGXU holds 72
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 20%·CGXU 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
166 of 179 positions (79.1% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in CGXU
59 of 72 positions (76.8% of the fund) are not held by BBJP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 15.2% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 20.3% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 12.6% |
| Materials | 3.5% | 13.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 5.4% |
| Other Sectors | 20.2% | 24.5% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 4.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 5% of CGXU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs CGXU →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the overlap, led by 9984, 8035 and 6501.
2.47% | 6.36% | 2.47% | |
2.51% | 2.29% | 2.29% | |
2.76% | 1.62% | 1.62% | |
2.04% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
1.25% | 1.50% | 1.25% | |
1.67% | 1.05% | 1.05% | |
1.69% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
1.66% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
1.15% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.24% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.59% | 0.75% | 0.59% | |
0.37% | 0.40% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.63% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and CGXU overlap?
BBJP and CGXU overlap by 14.8% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and CGXU holds 72), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and CGXU?
The two portfolios are 14.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and CGXU?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9984, 8035, 6501, 8411 and 6098. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that CGXU doesn't?
166 positions (79.1% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 8316. In the other direction, 59 positions (76.8% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU.