BBJP vs EFA: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBJP and EFA?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705. They have 171 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 171BBJP holds 179 · EFA holds 705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 98%·EFA 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
8 of 179 positions (0.9% of the fund) are not held by EFA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 18.5% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 23.8% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 9.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 6.4% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 9.7% |
| Other Sectors | 17.8% | 26.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 6% of EFA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs EFA →
Shared Holdings(171)
The top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the overlap, led by 8306, 7203 and 6501.
3.91% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
4.24% | 0.84% | 0.84% | |
2.76% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
2.48% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
2.51% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
2.60% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
2.47% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.30% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
2.04% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.27% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.93% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.86% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.67% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.66% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.69% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.66% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.58% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.67% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.25% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.22% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.15% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.15% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.24% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.10% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.01% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and EFA overlap?
BBJP and EFA overlap by 22.6% of portfolio weight. They share 171 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and EFA holds 705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and EFA?
The two portfolios are 22.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and EFA?
The largest positions held by both funds are 8306, 7203, 6501, 6857 and 8035. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that EFA doesn't?
8 positions (0.9% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 5334, 6506 and 2875. In the other direction, 534 positions (76.7% of EFA) are unique to EFA.