BBJP vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBJP and EFG?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 87 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 87BBJP holds 179 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 52%·EFG 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
92 of 179 positions (47.0% of the fund) are not held by EFG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 28.8% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 16.1% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 10.6% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 13.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 8.7% |
| Other Sectors | 17.8% | 15.7% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(87)
The top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the overlap, led by 6501, 6857 and 8035.
2.76% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
2.48% | 1.39% | 1.39% | |
2.51% | 1.28% | 1.28% | |
1.93% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
1.67% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.66% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
2.47% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
2.30% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.66% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.58% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
1.67% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
1.25% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.22% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
1.15% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
1.69% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.10% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.99% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.83% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.80% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.68% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.67% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.65% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.67% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.68% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.58% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and EFG overlap?
BBJP and EFG overlap by 22.9% of portfolio weight. They share 87 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and EFG?
The two portfolios are 22.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6501, 6857, 8035, 7011 and 9983. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that EFG doesn't?
92 positions (47.0% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 8316. In the other direction, 296 positions (76.7% of EFG) are unique to EFG.