BBJP vs ESGD: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
ESGDiShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares · 371 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, ESGD: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and ESGD?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD, by iShares) holds 371. They have 88 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 88BBJP holds 179 · ESGD holds 371
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 75%·ESGD 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
91 of 179 positions (23.6% of the fund) are not held by ESGD. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | ESGD |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 18.0% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 25.4% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 11.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 5.9% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 9.7% |
| Other Sectors | 17.8% | 24.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 4.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 5% of ESGD).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| ESGD | +4.5% | +15.1% | +24.6% | +17.5% | +9.3% | — | 3.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs ESGD →
Shared Holdings(88)
The top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the overlap, led by 9984, 8306 and 8035.
2.47% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
3.91% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
2.51% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
2.60% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
2.30% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
2.76% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
4.24% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
2.04% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.25% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.67% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.48% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.91% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.15% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.27% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.87% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.57% | 0.44% | |
1.67% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.69% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.58% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.22% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.79% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.24% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.93% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.44% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.67% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and ESGD overlap?
BBJP and ESGD overlap by 22.3% of portfolio weight. They share 88 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and ESGD holds 371), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and ESGD?
The two portfolios are 22.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and ESGD?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9984, 8306, 8035, 8316 and 6758. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 33% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that ESGD doesn't?
91 positions (23.6% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 8031, 2914 and 9434. In the other direction, 283 positions (76.2% of ESGD) are unique to ESGD.