BBJP vs FNDF: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Schwab · 888 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, FNDF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and FNDF?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF, by Schwab) holds 888. They have 153 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 153BBJP holds 179 · FNDF holds 888
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 95%·FNDF 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
26 of 179 positions (4.2% of the fund) are not held by FNDF.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | FNDF |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 11.4% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 15.8% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 7.9% |
| Energy | 0.9% | 10.0% |
| Other Sectors | 22.8% | 28.9% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 13% of FNDF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| FNDF | +4.2% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +23.1% | +14.5% | +12.0% | 2.97% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs FNDF →
Shared Holdings(153)
The top 10 shared positions account for 26% of the overlap, led by 7203, 8058 and 6752.
4.24% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
2.27% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.87% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.15% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.86% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.61% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
2.47% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
2.76% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.67% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.99% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.58% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.66% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
3.91% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
2.60% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.44% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
2.30% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.01% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
2.51% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.24% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.86% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.91% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.51% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
2.04% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.54% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.25% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and FNDF overlap?
BBJP and FNDF overlap by 18.6% of portfolio weight. They share 153 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and FNDF holds 888), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and FNDF?
The two portfolios are 18.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and FNDF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 7203, 8058, 6752, 6981 and 8031. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 26% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that FNDF doesn't?
26 positions (4.2% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 4062, 6920 and 7936. In the other direction, 735 positions (80.6% of FNDF) are unique to FNDF.