BBJP vs GSIE: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
GSIEGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs · 657 holdings · $6.0B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, GSIE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and GSIE?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) International Equity ETF (GSIE, by Goldman Sachs) holds 657. They have 142 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 142BBJP holds 179 · GSIE holds 657
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 92%·GSIE 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
37 of 179 positions (6.9% of the fund) are not held by GSIE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | GSIE |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 24.0% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 4.4% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 8.0% |
| Other Sectors | 17.8% | 23.7% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 15.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 15% of GSIE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| GSIE | +5.0% | +14.2% | +23.8% | +18.4% | +9.5% | +9.8% | 2.43% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs GSIE →
Shared Holdings(142)
The top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the overlap, led by 6857, 6098 and 8035.
2.48% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
1.25% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
2.51% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
3.91% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.86% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
2.76% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.44% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
2.27% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.22% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
2.47% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.99% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.68% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.39% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.54% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.44% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.01% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
2.30% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
4.24% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
2.60% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.69% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.15% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.62% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
2.04% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.69% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.65% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and GSIE overlap?
BBJP and GSIE overlap by 18.8% of portfolio weight. They share 142 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and GSIE holds 657), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and GSIE?
The two portfolios are 18.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and GSIE?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6857, 6098, 8035, 8306 and 8053. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that GSIE doesn't?
37 positions (6.9% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7974, 8801 and 6273. In the other direction, 515 positions (79.3% of GSIE) are unique to GSIE.