BBJP vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBJP and IMTM?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 82 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 82BBJP holds 179 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 58%·IMTM 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
97 of 179 positions (40.5% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 16.1% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 25.7% | 20.2% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 10.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 1.9% |
| Materials | 3.5% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 20.2% | 18.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(82)
The top 10 shared positions account for 45% of the overlap, led by 6857, 9984 and 7011.
2.48% | 1.73% | 1.73% | |
2.47% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.93% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
2.76% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
2.04% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
2.60% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.15% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
2.51% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.58% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
3.91% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
2.27% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.99% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.68% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
1.24% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.86% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.79% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.65% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.86% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.15% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.67% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.37% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.49% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.54% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.67% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.65% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and IMTM overlap?
BBJP and IMTM overlap by 22.1% of portfolio weight. They share 82 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 22.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6857, 9984, 7011, 6501 and 8411. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 45% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that IMTM doesn't?
97 positions (40.5% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 6758 and 8766. In the other direction, 231 positions (77.2% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.