BBJP vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBJP and IPAC?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 179 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 54.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 54.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 179BBJP holds 179 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 99%·IPAC 54%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
Every position in BBJP is also held by IPAC, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 20.1% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 7.5% |
| Materials | 3.5% | 6.3% |
| Other Sectors | 20.2% | 18.9% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(179)
The top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the overlap, led by 8306, 7203 and 6501.
3.91% | 2.21% | 2.21% | |
4.24% | 1.98% | 1.98% | |
2.76% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
2.48% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
2.51% | 1.44% | 1.44% | |
2.60% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
2.47% | 1.38% | 1.38% | |
2.30% | 1.34% | 1.34% | |
2.04% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
2.27% | 1.12% | 1.12% | |
1.93% | 1.04% | 1.04% | |
1.86% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
1.67% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.66% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.69% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.66% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.58% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.67% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
1.25% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
1.22% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
1.15% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.15% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.24% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.10% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.01% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and IPAC overlap?
BBJP and IPAC overlap by 54.0% of portfolio weight. They share 179 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 54.0% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 8306, 7203, 6501, 6857 and 8035. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that IPAC doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in BBJP is also held by IPAC. In the other direction, 1196 positions (45.3% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.