BBJP vs IXP: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
IXPiShares Global Comm Services ETF
iShares · 81 holdings · $577M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, IXP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and IXP?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP, by iShares) holds 81. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8BBJP holds 179 · IXP holds 81
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 6%·IXP 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
171 of 179 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by IXP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | IXP |
|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 6.2% | 99.8% |
| Industrials | 25.7% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 17.4% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 0% of IXP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| IXP | +1.2% | -2.0% | +6.3% | +20.8% | +8.3% | +8.8% | 3.33% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs IXP →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 9984, 7974 and 9433.
2.47% | 2.66% | 2.47% | |
1.10% | 1.88% | 1.10% | |
0.91% | 1.35% | 0.91% | |
0.77% | 1.08% | 0.77% | |
0.51% | 1.48% | 0.51% | |
0.21% | 0.36% | 0.21% | |
0.14% | 0.17% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.22% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and IXP overlap?
BBJP and IXP overlap by 6.2% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and IXP holds 81), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and IXP?
The two portfolios are 6.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and IXP?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9984, 7974, 9433, 9434 and 9432. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that IXP doesn't?
171 positions (92.7% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 6501. In the other direction, 73 positions (90.7% of IXP) are unique to IXP.