BBJP vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and SCHF?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 179 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 179BBJP holds 179 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 99%·SCHF 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
Every position in BBJP is also held by SCHF, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BBJP | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.7% | 14.5% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 21.7% |
| Information Technology | 14.7% | 15.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 5.7% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 7.1% |
| Other Sectors | 17.8% | 23.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.4% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of BBJP, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(179)
The top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the overlap, led by 8306, 7203 and 9984.
3.91% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
4.24% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
2.47% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.51% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.76% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
2.60% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
2.30% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
2.48% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.04% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
2.27% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.15% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.66% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.67% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.66% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.25% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.86% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.58% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.69% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.93% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.68% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.67% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.99% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.22% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.87% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.01% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and SCHF overlap?
BBJP and SCHF overlap by 17.3% of portfolio weight. They share 179 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 17.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 8306, 7203, 9984, 8035 and 6501. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that SCHF doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in BBJP is also held by SCHF. In the other direction, 1297 positions (82.1% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.