BBJP vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are BBJP and SCZ?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8BBJP holds 179 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 1%·SCZ 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
171 of 179 positions (98.0% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 5334, 6506 and 2875.
0.21% | 0.22% | 0.21% | |
0.17% | 0.22% | 0.17% | |
0.13% | 0.17% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.16% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 0.12% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and SCZ overlap?
BBJP and SCZ overlap by 0.9% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 0.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 5334, 6506, 2875, 9501 and 8952. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that SCZ doesn't?
171 positions (98.0% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 6501. In the other direction, 2036 positions (98.1% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.