CALF vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IVV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IVV?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14CALF holds 200 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 23%·IVV 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
186 of 200 positions (76.8% of the fund) are not held by IVV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 32.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 10.5% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 4.0% |
| Other Sectors | 25.4% | 30.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of IVV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by DVN, EXPE and OMC.
2.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
2.00% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.81% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
2.05% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.55% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
2.17% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.07% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.66% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
2.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.19% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.91% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.61% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.56% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IVV overlap?
CALF and IVV overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IVV?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are DVN, EXPE, OMC, NTAP and INCY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IVV doesn't?
186 positions (76.8% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and TOL. In the other direction, 489 positions (99.4% of IVV) are unique to IVV.