CGBL vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CGBL and IVV?
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 56 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 26.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 26.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 56CGBL holds 73 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGBL 49%·IVV 46%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGBL
17 of 73 positions (49.2% of the fund) are not held by IVV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGBL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 16.3% | 32.6% |
| Financials | 9.0% | 12.6% |
| Communication Services | 4.5% | 10.5% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.8% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 16.2% | 25.3% |
| Unclassified | 36.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (37% of CGBL, 0% of IVV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGBL vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(56)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by MSFT, AVGO and GOOG.
2.78% | 4.91% | 2.78% | |
4.16% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
2.49% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
1.45% | 6.65% | 1.45% | |
1.33% | 7.56% | 1.33% | |
1.21% | 2.23% | 1.21% | |
0.84% | 0.91% | 0.84% | |
0.76% | 3.63% | 0.76% | |
0.85% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.68% | 1.30% | 0.68% | |
0.84% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.59% | 1.42% | 0.59% | |
0.61% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.74% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.59% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.53% | 0.58% | 0.53% | |
2.42% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.57% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.59% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.79% | 0.42% | |
0.77% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.39% | 0.40% | 0.39% | |
0.78% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.49% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.71% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGBL and IVV overlap?
CGBL and IVV overlap by 26.9% of portfolio weight. They share 56 holdings (CGBL holds 73 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGBL and IVV?
The two portfolios are 26.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGBL and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, AVGO, GOOG, AAPL and NVDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does CGBL own that IVV doesn't?
17 positions (49.2% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL, led by CGCP, CGCB and TSM. In the other direction, 447 positions (53.5% of IVV) are unique to IVV.