CGDG vs EFAV: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 256 holdings · $5.4B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGDG: 2026-05-31, EFAV: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDG and EFAV?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV, by iShares) holds 256. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22CGDG holds 101 · EFAV holds 256
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 25%·EFAV 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
79 of 101 positions (73.2% of the fund) are not held by EFAV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | EFAV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.0% | 18.9% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 3.7% |
| Industrials | 10.9% | 13.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.0% | 11.7% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 10.8% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 32.0% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 9% of EFAV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| EFAV | +5.0% | +11.3% | +15.7% | +15.3% | +7.1% | +6.6% | 3.03% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs EFAV →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the overlap, led by TTE, IBE and DBS.
2.08% | 1.67% | 1.67% | |
1.63% | 1.51% | 1.51% | |
1.39% | 1.47% | 1.39% | |
1.07% | 1.34% | 1.07% | |
1.28% | 1.06% | 1.06% | |
1.15% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
0.85% | 0.95% | 0.85% | |
2.62% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.66% | 1.57% | 0.66% | |
2.05% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
1.19% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.00% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.57% | 0.80% | 0.57% | |
0.98% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.68% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.97% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.95% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.27% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.51% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.02% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.86% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.44% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and EFAV overlap?
CGDG and EFAV overlap by 14.3% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and EFAV holds 256), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and EFAV?
The two portfolios are 14.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and EFAV?
The largest positions held by both funds are TTE, IBE, DBS, ZURN and NESN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that EFAV doesn't?
79 positions (73.2% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by AVGO, TSM and PM. In the other direction, 234 positions (83.3% of EFAV) are unique to EFAV.