CGDG vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGDG: 2026-05-31, EFG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDG and EFG?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17CGDG holds 101 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 16%·EFG 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
84 of 101 positions (82.9% of the fund) are not held by EFG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 10.9% | 28.8% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 10.6% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 13.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.0% | 5.1% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 19.3% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by AZN, NOVOB and BA-.
2.62% | 2.86% | 2.62% | |
0.85% | 1.33% | 0.85% | |
0.85% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
0.65% | 1.29% | 0.65% | |
0.97% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
1.00% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.39% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.56% | 1.19% | 0.56% | |
0.54% | 0.75% | 0.54% | |
0.99% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.27% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.57% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.60% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.73% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.44% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.86% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.64% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and EFG overlap?
CGDG and EFG overlap by 9.6% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and EFG?
The two portfolios are 9.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are AZN, NOVOB, BA-, MC and REL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that EFG doesn't?
84 positions (82.9% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by AVGO, TSM and PM. In the other direction, 366 positions (87.7% of EFG) are unique to EFG.