CGDG vs EZU: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are CGDG and EZU?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18CGDG holds 101 · EZU holds 226
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 16%·EZU 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
83 of 101 positions (82.3% of the fund) are not held by EZU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.0% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 10.9% | 19.2% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 15.4% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 5.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.0% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 25.8% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 5% of EZU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs EZU →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by TTE, IBE and UCG.
2.08% | 2.24% | 2.08% | |
1.63% | 1.88% | 1.63% | |
1.27% | 1.56% | 1.27% | |
1.00% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.02% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.70% | 1.40% | 0.70% | |
0.72% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.68% | 0.88% | 0.68% | |
0.66% | 2.37% | 0.66% | |
0.65% | 1.75% | 0.65% | |
0.57% | 0.59% | 0.57% | |
0.56% | 1.60% | 0.56% | |
0.55% | 0.71% | 0.55% | |
0.60% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.57% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.88% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.15% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.86% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and EZU overlap?
CGDG and EZU overlap by 13.3% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and EZU holds 226), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and EZU?
The two portfolios are 13.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and EZU?
The largest positions held by both funds are TTE, IBE, UCG, ITX and ENGI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that EZU doesn't?
83 positions (82.3% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by AVGO, TSM and PM. In the other direction, 208 positions (80.9% of EZU) are unique to EZU.