CGDG vs FEZ: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
FEZState Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 51 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (CGDG: 2026-05-31, FEZ: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDG and FEZ?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF (FEZ, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 50. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12CGDG holds 101 · FEZ holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 11%·FEZ 28%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
89 of 101 positions (87.4% of the fund) are not held by FEZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | FEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.0% | 28.2% |
| Industrials | 10.9% | 21.9% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 12.6% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 5.1% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.0% | 5.3% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 24.6% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 0% of FEZ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| FEZ | +4.7% | +13.6% | +24.4% | +19.4% | +11.9% | +11.5% | 2.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs FEZ →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by TTE, IBE and UCG.
2.08% | 3.73% | 2.08% | |
1.63% | 2.87% | 1.63% | |
1.27% | 2.81% | 1.27% | |
1.00% | 1.44% | 1.00% | |
0.72% | 1.01% | 0.72% | |
0.70% | 2.57% | 0.70% | |
0.68% | 1.46% | 0.68% | |
0.66% | 4.16% | 0.66% | |
0.65% | 2.62% | 0.65% | |
0.57% | 0.96% | 0.57% | |
0.56% | 2.75% | 0.56% | |
0.55% | 1.15% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and FEZ overlap?
CGDG and FEZ overlap by 11.1% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and FEZ holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and FEZ?
The two portfolios are 11.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and FEZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are TTE, IBE, UCG, ITX and BAS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that FEZ doesn't?
89 positions (87.4% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by AVGO, TSM and PM. In the other direction, 38 positions (70.2% of FEZ) are unique to FEZ.