CGDG vs IQLT: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 309 holdings · $14.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGDG: 2026-05-31, IQLT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDG and IQLT?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT, by iShares) holds 309. They have 25 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 25CGDG holds 101 · IQLT holds 309
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 25%·IQLT 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
76 of 101 positions (73.3% of the fund) are not held by IQLT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.0% | 23.4% |
| Industrials | 10.9% | 17.3% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 10.8% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.0% | 6.2% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 27.3% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 5.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 5% of IQLT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| IQLT | +4.5% | +15.4% | +24.8% | +16.1% | +8.2% | +10.1% | 2.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs IQLT →
Shared Holdings(25)
The top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the overlap, led by AZN, NESN and IBE.
2.62% | 2.02% | 2.02% | |
1.28% | 1.99% | 1.28% | |
1.63% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.07% | 1.61% | 1.07% | |
0.99% | 1.55% | 0.99% | |
0.95% | 2.17% | 0.95% | |
0.97% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.39% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.00% | 0.91% | 0.91% | |
0.85% | 1.11% | 0.85% | |
0.85% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.68% | 1.14% | 0.68% | |
0.66% | 2.55% | 0.66% | |
0.65% | 0.96% | 0.65% | |
2.05% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.58% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.75% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.18% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.82% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.15% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.60% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.51% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.86% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.64% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.44% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and IQLT overlap?
CGDG and IQLT overlap by 17.1% of portfolio weight. They share 25 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and IQLT holds 309), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and IQLT?
The two portfolios are 17.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and IQLT?
The largest positions held by both funds are AZN, NESN, IBE, ZURN and 8766. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that IQLT doesn't?
76 positions (73.3% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by AVGO, TSM and PM. In the other direction, 284 positions (76.3% of IQLT) are unique to IQLT.