CGDG vs JEPQ: Holdings Overlap
CGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Capital Group · 101 holdings · $5.6B · as of 2026-05-31
JEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
JPMorgan · 107 holdings · $39.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGDG: 2026-05-31, JEPQ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDG and JEPQ?
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG, by Capital Group) holds 101 positions; JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ, by JPMorgan) holds 107. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12CGDG holds 101 · JEPQ holds 107
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDG 14%·JEPQ 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDG
89 of 101 positions (84.1% of the fund) are not held by JEPQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDG | JEPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 40.2% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 0.5% |
| Communication Services | 2.8% | 12.5% |
| Industrials | 10.9% | 2.9% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 4.2% |
| Other Sectors | 39.4% | 19.3% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 16.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGDG, 18% of JEPQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | +2.5% | +11.0% | +18.6% | — | — | — | 2.20% |
| JEPQ | +1.9% | +10.1% | +21.5% | +19.2% | — | — | 10.92% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDG vs JEPQ →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and LIN.
4.63% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
0.89% | 4.81% | 0.89% | |
1.09% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
0.65% | 0.86% | 0.65% | |
0.56% | 1.12% | 0.56% | |
1.41% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.68% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.44% | 0.58% | 0.44% | |
1.58% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.80% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.08% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.52% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDG and JEPQ overlap?
CGDG and JEPQ overlap by 7.6% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (CGDG holds 101 positions and JEPQ holds 107), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDG and JEPQ?
The two portfolios are 7.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDG and JEPQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, LIN, TMUS and ADI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CGDG own that JEPQ doesn't?
89 positions (84.1% of CGDG) are unique to CGDG, led by TSM, PM and AZN. In the other direction, 95 positions (84.1% of JEPQ) are unique to JEPQ.