CGDV vs TDIV: Holdings Overlap
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
Capital Group · 52 holdings · $37.4B · as of 2026-05-31
TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
First Trust · 95 holdings · $4.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGDV: 2026-05-31, TDIV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDV and TDIV?
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV, by Capital Group) holds 52 positions; First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV, by First Trust) holds 95. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 24.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 24.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11CGDV holds 52 · TDIV holds 95
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDV 27%·TDIV 46%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDV
41 of 52 positions (70.9% of the fund) are not held by TDIV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDV | TDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 34.4% | 80.7% |
| Communication Services | 8.7% | 14.1% |
| Industrials | 13.0% | 2.1% |
| Health Care | 9.9% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 2.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of CGDV, 3% of TDIV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | +4.9% | +18.2% | +28.6% | +24.3% | — | — | 1.14% |
| TDIV | +4.3% | +21.7% | +31.1% | +27.8% | +17.1% | +17.5% | 1.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDV vs TDIV →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by MSFT, AVGO and TSM.
5.81% | 7.87% | 5.81% | |
5.16% | 8.09% | 5.16% | |
2.16% | 3.77% | 2.16% | |
3.02% | 2.04% | 2.04% | |
3.12% | 1.88% | 1.88% | |
1.75% | 1.94% | 1.75% | |
1.60% | 8.07% | 1.60% | |
1.21% | 7.64% | 1.21% | |
0.92% | 2.16% | 0.92% | |
1.42% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
0.84% | 1.26% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDV and TDIV overlap?
CGDV and TDIV overlap by 24.2% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (CGDV holds 52 positions and TDIV holds 95), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDV and TDIV?
The two portfolios are 24.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDV and TDIV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, AVGO, TSM, CSCO and AMAT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CGDV own that TDIV doesn't?
41 positions (70.9% of CGDV) are unique to CGDV, led by NVDA, GOOGL and META. In the other direction, 84 positions (54.3% of TDIV) are unique to TDIV.