CGGR vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGR: 2026-05-31, IWP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGR and IWP?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19CGGR holds 88 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 11%·IWP 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
69 of 88 positions (87.3% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 15.6% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 21.2% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 4.9% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 14.9% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 18.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the overlap, led by NET, PWR and ALNY.
1.65% | 2.33% | 1.65% | |
0.99% | 2.25% | 0.99% | |
0.76% | 1.51% | 0.76% | |
0.76% | 2.51% | 0.76% | |
0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.57% | 0.87% | 0.57% | |
0.52% | 0.90% | 0.52% | |
0.43% | 1.53% | 0.43% | |
0.50% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.39% | 0.44% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.74% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.40% | 0.36% | |
0.56% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 1.13% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.28% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 1.26% | 0.25% | |
0.23% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.83% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.24% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and IWP overlap?
CGGR and IWP overlap by 9.2% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and IWP?
The two portfolios are 9.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are NET, PWR, ALNY, RCL and FICO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that IWP doesn't?
69 positions (87.3% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by META, TSLA and AVGO. In the other direction, 258 positions (82.1% of IWP) are unique to IWP.