CGGR vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGR: 2026-05-31, QTEC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGR and QTEC?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15CGGR holds 88 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 42%·QTEC 31%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
73 of 88 positions (56.0% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 86.5% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 6.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 4.7% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 2.2% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT.
5.16% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
5.40% | 2.31% | 2.31% | |
4.37% | 2.24% | 2.24% | |
7.09% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
4.86% | 1.85% | 1.85% | |
1.79% | 2.37% | 1.79% | |
1.63% | 2.35% | 1.63% | |
1.19% | 2.33% | 1.19% | |
1.17% | 2.27% | 1.17% | |
3.36% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
3.06% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.03% | 2.13% | 1.03% | |
0.83% | 2.32% | 0.83% | |
0.57% | 2.08% | 0.57% | |
0.50% | 2.22% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and QTEC overlap?
CGGR and QTEC overlap by 21.9% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 21.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, META and MU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that QTEC doesn't?
73 positions (56.0% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by TSLA, AMZN and V. In the other direction, 30 positions (68.7% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.