CGUS vs MOAT: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VanEck · 57 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, MOAT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and MOAT?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT, by VanEck) holds 57. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9CGUS holds 65 · MOAT holds 57
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 33%·MOAT 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
56 of 65 positions (64.5% of the fund) are not held by MOAT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 25.5% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 19.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.3% | 18.3% |
| Health Care | 8.5% | 18.1% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 2.3% |
| Other Sectors | 27.8% | 16.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of MOAT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| MOAT | +5.9% | +8.4% | +18.6% | +12.6% | +9.4% | +13.9% | 1.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs MOAT →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AMAT.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp | 6.85% | 2.50% | 2.50% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 2.22% | 2.22% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc | 2.57% | 1.35% | 1.35% |
 AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 5.04% | 1.31% | 1.31% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.33% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
 METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.79% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
 ENTGEntegris Inc | 1.07% | 1.34% | 1.07% |
 CRMSalesforce Inc | 0.61% | 0.98% | 0.61% |
 MDLZMondelez International Inc | 0.59% | 2.74% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and MOAT overlap?
CGUS and MOAT overlap by 12.0% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and MOAT holds 57), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and MOAT?
The two portfolios are 12.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and MOAT?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AMAT, AMZN and AVGO. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that MOAT doesn't?
56 positions (64.5% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by LLY, GOOGL and AAPL. In the other direction, 48 positions (85.1% of MOAT) are unique to MOAT.