CGUS vs PTLC: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
Pacer · 504 holdings · $3.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, PTLC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and PTLC?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC, by Pacer) holds 504. They have 56 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 45.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 45.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 56CGUS holds 65 · PTLC holds 504
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 87%·PTLC 52%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
9 of 65 positions (10.1% of the fund) are not held by PTLC.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | PTLC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 34.8% |
| Financials | 9.4% | 12.0% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 11.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 10.0% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 8.8% |
| Other Sectors | 21.0% | 23.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of PTLC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| PTLC | +3.4% | +8.5% | +17.4% | +13.9% | +10.3% | +11.1% | 0.98% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs PTLC →
Shared Holdings(56)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AMZN.
6.85% | 7.86% | 6.85% | |
5.75% | 4.91% | 4.91% | |
5.04% | 4.20% | 4.20% | |
3.22% | 3.63% | 3.22% | |
6.33% | 3.21% | 3.21% | |
2.75% | 6.46% | 2.75% | |
3.79% | 2.17% | 2.17% | |
1.93% | 2.89% | 1.93% | |
1.79% | 1.37% | 1.37% | |
3.92% | 1.20% | 1.20% | |
0.67% | 0.90% | 0.67% | |
1.82% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.30% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.60% | 0.61% | 0.60% | |
1.95% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.29% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
0.82% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
2.57% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.49% | 0.72% | 0.49% | |
0.70% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 1.05% | 0.44% | |
0.88% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.13% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.95% | 0.38% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and PTLC overlap?
CGUS and PTLC overlap by 45.1% of portfolio weight. They share 56 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and PTLC holds 504), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and PTLC?
The two portfolios are 45.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and PTLC?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that PTLC doesn't?
9 positions (10.1% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by TSM, BATS and CNQ. In the other direction, 448 positions (47.7% of PTLC) are unique to PTLC.