CGUS vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, QTEC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and QTEC?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 19.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 19.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12CGUS holds 65 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 37%·QTEC 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
53 of 65 positions (60.1% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QTEC
33 of 45 positions (75.0% of the fund) are not held by CGUS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 86.5% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 6.5% |
| Financials | 9.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 2.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 4.7% |
| Other Sectors | 21.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of QTEC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by AAPL, NVDA and AVGO.
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 2.75% | 2.37% | 2.37% |
|---|---|---|---|
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 6.85% | 2.34% | 2.34% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 6.33% | 2.31% | 2.31% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 5.75% | 2.24% | 2.24% |
 METAMeta Platforms Inc CL A | 3.79% | 2.23% | 2.23% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 2.57% | 2.22% | 2.22% |
 STXSeagate Technology Holdings PLC ORD SHS | 2.11% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 1.93% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 3.22% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.60% | 2.27% | 0.60% |
 CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. CL A | 0.53% | 2.29% | 0.53% |
 INTCIntel Corporation COM | 0.49% | 2.33% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and QTEC overlap?
CGUS and QTEC overlap by 19.7% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 19.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are AAPL, NVDA, AVGO, MSFT and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that QTEC doesn't?
53 positions (60.1% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by AMZN, LLY and TSM. In the other direction, 33 positions (75.0% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.