CGUS vs VOT: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
VOTVanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 130 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, VOT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and VOT?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; Vanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund (VOT, by Vanguard) holds 130. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4CGUS holds 65 · VOT holds 130
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 4%·VOT 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
61 of 65 positions (92.6% of the fund) are not held by VOT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VOT
126 of 130 positions (94.9% of the fund) are not held by CGUS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 22.5% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 25.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 15.2% |
| Health Care | 8.5% | 10.5% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 4.0% |
| Other Sectors | 22.0% | 22.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of VOT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| VOT | +1.9% | +10.1% | +7.1% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +11.9% | 0.59% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs VOT →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by STX, RCL and GLW.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and VOT overlap?
CGUS and VOT overlap by 4.2% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and VOT holds 130), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and VOT?
The two portfolios are 4.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and VOT?
The largest positions held by both funds are STX, RCL, GLW and IR. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that VOT doesn't?
61 positions (92.6% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT. In the other direction, 126 positions (94.9% of VOT) are unique to VOT.