CGXU vs EFA: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 705 holdings · $79.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, EFA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and EFA?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA, by iShares) holds 705. They have 45 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 45CGXU holds 72 · EFA holds 705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 52%·EFA 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
27 of 72 positions (44.2% of the fund) are not held by EFA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 12.6% | 23.8% |
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 9.1% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 18.5% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 5.8% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 4.1% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 32.5% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 6% of EFA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| EFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +17.9% | +9.6% | +9.7% | 3.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs EFA →
Shared Holdings(45)
The top 10 shared positions account for 50% of the overlap, led by ASML, NESN and SIE.
2.43% | 2.58% | 2.43% | |
1.05% | 1.20% | 1.05% | |
0.74% | 1.04% | 0.74% | |
1.62% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
2.46% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.08% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.29% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
6.36% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
1.43% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.11% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.10% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 0.76% | 0.51% | |
1.46% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.69% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.17% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.05% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.00% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.95% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.90% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.70% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.62% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.62% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.50% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.12% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.68% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and EFA overlap?
CGXU and EFA overlap by 17.1% of portfolio weight. They share 45 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and EFA holds 705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and EFA?
The two portfolios are 17.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and EFA?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, NESN, SIE, 6501 and NOVOB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 50% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that EFA doesn't?
27 positions (44.2% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by TSMWF, FM and 000660. In the other direction, 660 positions (81.4% of EFA) are unique to EFA.