CGXU vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, EFG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and EFG?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 19.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 19.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30CGXU holds 72 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 40%·EFG 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
42 of 72 positions (56.3% of the fund) are not held by EFG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 15.2% | 28.8% |
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 16.1% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 4.3% |
| Health Care | 3.6% | 13.3% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 10.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.3% | 20.1% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the overlap, led by ASML, 6501 and NOVOB.
2.43% | 5.46% | 2.43% | |
1.62% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
2.46% | 1.33% | 1.33% | |
2.29% | 1.28% | 1.28% | |
2.11% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
1.08% | 1.31% | 1.08% | |
1.17% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
1.05% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
6.36% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
0.90% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.10% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 0.77% | 0.74% | |
0.69% | 1.01% | 0.69% | |
1.50% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.62% | 0.64% | 0.62% | |
0.62% | 0.63% | 0.62% | |
1.00% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 1.60% | 0.51% | |
1.17% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.61% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.09% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.16% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.68% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.40% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.00% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and EFG overlap?
CGXU and EFG overlap by 19.7% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and EFG?
The two portfolios are 19.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, 6501, NOVOB, 8035 and AIR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that EFG doesn't?
42 positions (56.3% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by TSMWF, FM and 000660. In the other direction, 353 positions (75.1% of EFG) are unique to EFG.