CGXU vs IEFA: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares · 2632 holdings · $193.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, IEFA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and IEFA?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA, by iShares) holds 2632. They have 46 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 46CGXU holds 72 · IEFA holds 2632
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 53%·IEFA 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
26 of 72 positions (43.3% of the fund) are not held by IEFA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 12.6% | 20.5% |
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 7.9% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 16.0% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 5.4% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 29.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 17.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 17% of IEFA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| IEFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +24.5% | +17.9% | +9.3% | +9.8% | 3.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs IEFA →
Shared Holdings(46)
The top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the overlap, led by ASML, NESN and SIE.
2.43% | 2.21% | 2.21% | |
1.05% | 1.03% | 1.03% | |
0.74% | 0.89% | 0.74% | |
1.62% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
2.46% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.08% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
2.29% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.51% | 0.65% | 0.51% | |
6.36% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.43% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
2.11% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.10% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.46% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.69% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.17% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.05% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.00% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.95% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.90% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.70% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.62% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.62% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.50% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.12% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.68% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and IEFA overlap?
CGXU and IEFA overlap by 15.1% of portfolio weight. They share 46 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and IEFA holds 2632), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and IEFA?
The two portfolios are 15.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and IEFA?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, NESN, SIE, 6501 and NOVOB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that IEFA doesn't?
26 positions (43.3% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by TSMWF, FM and 000660. In the other direction, 2586 positions (84.0% of IEFA) are unique to IEFA.