CGXU vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, IPAC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and IPAC?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17CGXU holds 72 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 23%·IPAC 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
55 of 72 positions (73.3% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IPAC
1358 of 1375 positions (86.2% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 9.0% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 20.1% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 15.3% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 6.3% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 4.5% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 21.8% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the overlap, led by 6501, 8035 and 9984.
1.62% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
2.29% | 1.44% | 1.44% | |
6.36% | 1.38% | 1.38% | |
1.46% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
1.10% | 1.25% | 1.10% | |
1.05% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.00% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
0.90% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.50% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.76% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.69% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.61% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.75% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.64% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.16% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.40% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.63% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and IPAC overlap?
CGXU and IPAC overlap by 13.0% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 13.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6501, 8035, 9984, 8411 and 1299. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that IPAC doesn't?
55 positions (73.3% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by TSMWF, FM and 000660. In the other direction, 1358 positions (86.2% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.