CGXU vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, QTEC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and QTEC?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1CGXU holds 72 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 2%·QTEC 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
71 of 72 positions (94.7% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QTEC
44 of 45 positions (97.3% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 86.5% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 2.2% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 6.5% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 4.7% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 0% of QTEC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(1)
1.57% | 2.65% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and QTEC overlap?
CGXU and QTEC overlap by 1.6% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 1.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are ARM. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that QTEC doesn't?
71 positions (94.7% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by TSMWF, 9984 and FM. In the other direction, 44 positions (97.3% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.