CGXU vs VT: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and VT?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 68 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 68CGXU holds 72 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 92%·VT 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
4 of 72 positions (4.0% of the fund) are not held by VT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 25.9% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 10.2% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 14.5% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 3.4% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 7.8% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 28.4% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs VT →
Shared Holdings(68)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 005930 and ASML.
6.83% | 1.51% | 1.51% | |
3.10% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
2.43% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
3.27% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.27% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.05% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.74% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.51% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.62% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.08% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.46% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
6.36% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.29% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.43% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
2.11% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.46% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.17% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
3.00% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.53% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.25% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.05% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.90% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.69% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.00% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and VT overlap?
CGXU and VT overlap by 7.0% of portfolio weight. They share 68 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and VT?
The two portfolios are 7.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 005930, ASML, 000660 and 700. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that VT doesn't?
4 positions (4.0% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by ARM, BTI1RUB and SE. In the other direction, 9965 positions (92.4% of VT) are unique to VT.