CIBR vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and IVV?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 16 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 16CIBR holds 42 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 64%·IVV 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
26 of 42 positions (35.9% of the fund) are not held by IVV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 32.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 10.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.8% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 6.5% | 24.8% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of IVV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(16)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and GOOGL.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 2.62% | 2.62% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 4.91% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 2.99% | 1.81% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.87% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc COM | 1.74% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and IVV overlap?
CIBR and IVV overlap by 8.4% of portfolio weight. They share 16 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and IVV?
The two portfolios are 8.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, GOOGL, CSCO and IBM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that IVV doesn't?
26 positions (35.9% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NET, ZS and CHKP. In the other direction, 487 positions (87.2% of IVV) are unique to IVV.